Quick Verdict
-
PropellerAds is better for advertisers who want massive scale, advanced automation, and long-term campaign growth.
-
AdMaven is better for beginners and small advertisers who want low entry cost and fast campaign testing.
-
Both platforms are legitimate push and pop traffic networks, but they serve different experience levels and business goals.
Push and pop advertising remain two of the strongest traffic sources in performance marketing. These formats allow advertisers to reach users instantly, drive conversions quickly, and test offers at scale.
If you’re looking beyond mega-platforms like Google Ads and seeking high-volume, direct-response traffic, PropellerAds and AdMaven are frequently top of mind. However, success depends heavily on choosing the right traffic source.
Two of the most well-known networks in this space are PropellerAds and AdMaven. Both platforms provide push and pop traffic worldwide, but they differ in scale, automation, pricing flexibility, optimization depth, and user experience.
This in-depth comparison explains how PropellerAds and AdMaven perform across all major factors that matter to advertisers and publishers, including features, traffic quality, automation, pricing, ease of use, pros, cons, and ideal use cases.
By the end of this article, you will clearly understand which platform fits your needs.
Factors to Consider Before Choosing a Push & Pop Ad Network
Before selecting any ad network, it is important to evaluate the following:
- Traffic quality and consistency
- Available ad formats
- Automation and optimization tools
- Minimum budget requirements
- Targeting options
- Analytics and reporting
- Platform reputation
- Customer support
Both PropellerAds and AdMaven address these areas differently, which is why a detailed comparison is necessary.
Features Comparison
| Feature Category | PropellerAds | AdMaven |
| Core Focus | Multisource performance advertising and automation | Performance-driven traffic with easy entry |
| Ad Formats | Popunder, Push, In-Page Push, Survey Exit, Telegram Ads | Pop, Push, In-Page Push, Interstitial, Content Locker |
| Daily Impressions | 14+ billion | 1+ billion |
| Monthly Popunder Impressions | 22+ billion | Not publicly disclosed |
| Automation Tools | CPA Goal, Auto Rules, Smart Rotator, Multiformat campaigns | Smart bidding, AI-powered self-serve |
| Targeting Options | GEO, device, OS, browser, carrier, interests | GEO, device, OS, browser, language |
| Traffic Protection | Advanced anti-fraud algorithms | Anti-adblock and traffic filtering |
| Analytics | Traffic estimator, win rate, performance breakdown | Real-time statistics, campaign dashboards |
PropellerAds focuses heavily on automation and advanced optimization. Its system allows advertisers to define goals and let the platform optimize campaigns automatically.
AdMaven focuses more on accessibility and simplicity. Advertisers can launch campaigns quickly without dealing with complex configurations.
Performance & Value Comparison
| Aspect | PropellerAds | AdMaven |
| Consistency of Traffic | High, multiple vetted sources, anti-fraud system | Moderate, occasional GEO variability, anti-adblock protection |
| Automation & Optimization | Advanced, includes CPA Goal, Smart Rotator | Basic smart bidding, limited automation |
| ROI Potential | High for experienced advertisers | Moderate, suitable for testing campaigns |
| Minimum Budget Flexibility | Moderate ($500+ recommended) | Low (start from $50) |
| Reporting & Analytics | Detailed, performance-focused | Real-time, simpler dashboard |
| Publisher Payout | Net-15/Weekly, reliable | Monthly, occasional delays reported |
PropellerAds is optimized for high-scale campaigns with measurable ROI and automation. AdMaven is more budget-friendly, easier for newcomers, and supports testing across a few key GEOs or formats.
Traffic Quality & Performance Comparison
PropellerAds uses advanced anti-fraud systems and supply partner vetting to maintain traffic quality. The platform operates as a multisource network, meaning advertisers can access multiple inventory sources within one interface.
AdMaven highlights exclusive traffic and anti-adblock technology. This allows advertisers to reach users who are often unreachable through traditional display ads.
In short:
- PropellerAds offers more consistent performance at scale.
- AdMaven performs well for testing but may show greater variability between GEOs.
Automation & Optimization Comparison
PropellerAds is designed for advertisers who want to automate optimization as much as possible. AdMaven provides basic automation but relies more on manual optimization.
| Aspect | PropellerAds | AdMaven |
| Automation Level | Very high | Moderate |
| Auto Rules | Yes | Limited |
| Goal-Based Optimization | CPA Goal | Basic smart bidding |
| Multiformat Campaigns | Yes | No |
The advanced analytics and terminology in PropellerAds can be complex for beginners, including multi-metric performance reporting and multiformat bid adjustments, whereas AdMaven’s interface is straightforward.
User Experience & Ease of Use
| Aspect | PropellerAds | AdMaven |
| Interface Complexity | Advanced | Simple |
| Learning Curve | Medium to high; many settings and analytics | Low; intuitive dashboard |
| Setup Speed | Moderate | Fast |
| Beginner Friendliness | Moderate | High |
Beginners generally feel more comfortable starting with AdMaven. Experienced advertisers prefer PropellerAds due to deeper control.
Reviews & Reputation Comparison
PropellerAds is frequently described on review platforms and affiliate forums as a reliable large-scale traffic source. Users commonly praise its volume, automation tools, and targeting options. Some mention a learning curve.
AdMaven is often described as easy to use and affordable. Many beginners report good initial results, while some advanced users mention limited optimization features.
PropellerAds is praised on Trustpilot and G2 for reliable high-volume traffic, advanced automation, and strong targeting. Some beginners find the learning curve steep. AdMaven receives positive reviews for affordability, ease of use, and quality traffic, though some advanced users note fewer optimization features and occasional payout delays.
Pricing Overview Comparison
| Pricing Factor | PropellerAds | AdMaven |
| Minimum Deposit | Varies by format & GEO | Around $50 |
| Bidding Models | CPM, SmartCPM, CPA Goal | CPM |
| Cost Flexibility | High | Medium |
| Payment Methods | Card, PayPal, Wire, Paxum, Crypto | Card, PayPal, Wire, Crypto |
AdMaven is easier to start with a small budget. PropellerAds provides more bidding models for scaling.
Pros Comparison
| PropellerAds Pros | AdMaven Pros |
| Massive traffic volume | Low minimum deposit |
| Advanced automation | Beginner-friendly |
| Many ad formats | Simple setup |
| Strong analytics | Anti-adblock traffic |
| Excellent for scaling | Good for testing |
Cons Comparison
PropellerAds Cons
|
AdMaven Cons
|
|---|
Best For Comparison
PropellerAds is best for:
- Media buying agencies
- Experienced affiliates
- Brands scaling globally
AdMaven is best for:
- Beginners
- Small advertisers
- Budget testers
Use Case Scenarios
Understanding how these platforms perform in real-world situations can help you decide which one to use based on your goals, experience, and budget.
Scenario 1: Beginner Affiliate Marketer
AdMaven is usually the better starting point due to low cost and a simple interface. This makes it easy for beginners to launch campaigns quickly without getting overwhelmed by complex settings or high minimum budgets.
Scenario 2: Scaling Campaigns
PropellerAds is better because of automation and large volume. Its advanced tools allow experienced advertisers to optimize campaigns automatically and scale quickly, which is ideal when growing your campaigns beyond testing.
Scenario 3: Global Brand Campaigns
PropellerAds offers a broader reach and better controls. Brands running international campaigns can take advantage of its extensive targeting options and global traffic to reach audiences effectively across multiple countries.
Scenario 4: Native/SEO Blocker Popups
PropellerAds supports in-page push and content lockers with advanced targeting; AdMaven works but is simpler for testing.
Scenario 5: Hyper-Targeted Niche Campaigns
PropellerAds provides fine-grained targeting by carrier, browser, and interests; AdMaven allows basic targeting but with fewer options.
Direct Comparison Summary
| Choose PropellerAds if you… | Choose AdMaven if you… |
| Have a testing budget of typically $100-$200 | Want to start with under $100 |
| Need advanced automation to scale | Prefer to manually optimize |
| Run campaigns in multiple GEOs/formats | Focus on a few key GEOs |
| Value deep data and reporting | Want a simple, clean dashboard |
Final Verdict
PropellerAds and AdMaven are both reputable, performance-focused ad networks that specialize in push and pop traffic, but they serve different types of advertisers. PropellerAds is built for scale, automation, and long-term optimization, offering massive traffic volume, advanced targeting, and powerful automated tools that help experienced marketers grow campaigns across multiple GEOs and formats.
AdMaven, on the other hand, focuses on accessibility and affordability, providing a simpler platform with lower entry barriers that allows beginners and small advertisers to launch campaigns quickly and test ideas without heavy technical complexity.
When comparing both platforms side by side, PropellerAds clearly stands out for advertisers who need deep control, data-driven optimization, and the ability to manage large budgets efficiently. AdMaven shines as an entry-level solution that prioritizes ease of use, fast setup, and cost-effective testing.
Your final choice should depend on your experience level, budget size, and growth objectives. If your goal is aggressive scaling and long-term profitability, PropellerAds is usually the better fit. If your goal is learning, experimenting, and getting initial traction, AdMaven is often the smarter starting point.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Is PropellerAds legit?
Yes, PropellerAds is a legitimate and well-established ad network that has been operating for many years in the performance marketing industry. It is widely used by affiliates, media buying agencies, and brands worldwide. The platform processes billions of impressions daily, offers transparent reporting, and provides dedicated support, which helps build long-term trust among advertisers.
Is AdMaven good for beginners?
Yes, AdMaven is considered one of the most beginner-friendly push and pop ad networks. It offers a simple dashboard, fast campaign setup, and low minimum deposit requirements. These factors make it easy for new advertisers to start testing campaigns without needing advanced technical knowledge or large budgets.
Which platform has better push traffic?
PropellerAds generally provides better push traffic for advertisers who want scale, advanced targeting, and automation. AdMaven offers solid push traffic as well, but it is more suitable for entry-level testing. The best option depends on whether you prioritize volume and optimization or simplicity and ease of use.
Which has better popunder traffic?
PropellerAds typically delivers larger popunder traffic volume and broader GEO coverage compared to AdMaven. This makes it more suitable for advertisers running large-scale pop campaigns. AdMaven still provides quality pop traffic, but at a smaller scale and with fewer optimization layers.
Can I use both platforms?
Yes, many advertisers use both PropellerAds and AdMaven together. Running small test campaigns on each platform allows you to compare performance, traffic quality, and ROI. This approach helps you identify which network performs best for your specific niche and offers.